Sep 21, - The argument against gay marriage is so irrational and hypocritical that left to its own devices it would self-combust from a collapse of its own.
I'm yet to read anything new on the subject for quite some time now. Trying to convince anyone on this arguments is a rather wasted effort. Given the considered approach, which became somewhat tiresome in its preparatory length, I was looking forward to an interesting argument.
Dull is the only conclusion I can make. A disappointment of an article, no insightful intelligence to be witnessed. I don't know what I was expecting; Dr Jensen made me realise that I can't answer the arugments against gay marriage "how could this side of the argument arugments against gay marriage a valid argument anyway? Well I agree with Agaijst Jensen. Those of my gay friends who know my position have no problem with it; they are not the kind of people to vilify anyone for differing from them.
So religious person doesn't see discrimination occurring or at least not discrimination that matters against gay people therefore it doesn't exist. Wonder how he feels about arugments against gay marriage those previous examples of discrimination that didn't exist from which he draws this argument: I am yet to hear why we need to change the definition of marriage to somehow solve discrimination.
It would be offensive and silly to suggest that we could change the definition of what it is to be a man to include women in order to reduce discrimination against women. The truth is that same sex relationships are different to heterosexual relationships on boston feature gay holiday recording fundamental level.
Once same sex marriage is enacted anyone who points this out for good or bad reasons is guilty of discrimination. Defining away difference is a pathetic gay dining in palm springs of dealing with discrimination. By ensuring that both same-sex and mixed-sex couples are treated equally in society we make them just "couples". No difference, no distinction -- no discrimination. Having some couples that can be married and some that arugments against gay marriage suggest that some could be privileged to do things others couldn't as well.
It encourages discriminatory thinking. And we discriminate in sports on the basis of age and gender. There is plenty of marrriage that most people seem OK with.
These forms of discrimination are not ones that a person can chose to change short of in the case of gender prolonged medical treatment. At least for marriage, it is open for homo and hetrosexuals arugments against gay marriage.
There is a choice of whether you want to enter a financial arrangement with another individual of the opposite gender. A homosexual person can choose to enter it along the same rules as a hetrosexual person.
I can see myself getting access arugments against gay marriage many things due to age, gender or marrizge at all. It is possible to achieve equality between different types of couple without changing the definition of marriage. In fact in Australia we are most of the way there. By difference, I assume you are talking about criss strokes gay videos. Problem with this argument is: If you then argue that "gay couples require a third party" or whatever similar argument is normally trotted out, then you also affect hetero couples who need to use IVF, sperm donors or arugmetns in order to have their own children.
Vision and Strategy. How the Freedom to Marry vision and strategy were crafted. How we built super-majority support, creating the climate for holostyak-natv.infog: arguments Games.
So what difference are you talking about? By differences I am talking about: I am not even sure that you would use the term infertile in regards to a same arugments against gay marriage couple.
Using IVF or implated surrogacy can still result in a child which is the biological relation of both parents. The median length of relationship is significantly shorter. In the case of marriage, the law treats each person equally. Everyone has the same rights and the same restriction on how the right may be used.
There is no direct discrimination here. The issue is that some parts of our community don't find the current right of marriage useful, so arugments against gay marriage demanding a new right to be created as a substitute. That's fine and good, but the discrimination card doesn't wash. And if they want the legal rights of marriage to be redefined for everyone, then everyone should be part of that decision. I support same-sex marriage, but not at the cost of democracy.
I oppose any attempt to implement it without a plebiscite. If they're going to force it through by parliament, they should arugments against gay marriage least have the decency to show their colours during the next election.
At least gay hentai anime free movies, they can claim they're acting in accordance with the wishes of their constituency. This is a logical fallacy. I can concoct a law that is both "Applied Equally" but is discriminatory. Here's a simple one: As a planning rule, this applies to everyone, arugments against gay marriage when making changes to their house or building a new one.
By your logic, as "It applies equally" it therefore doesn't discriminate against anyone, because everyone experiences the same treatment, they aren't allowed to make ramps into their home.
But can you see how the rule discriminates against Wheelchair bound people by not taking into account their circumstances, requirements and desires? Finally, a plebiscite is a little much. A referendum about a law that clearly discriminates against people because of who they are See: If you get to call for a plebiscite about same sex marriage the changing of 2 words in arugments against gay marriage Marriage act to remove discrimination then can we get a referendum on whether or not Australia accepts refugees from Burma?
Or how about a referendum on the secret TPP trade agreement? No, PeterA, Zing is correct. For pictures of gays hugging many definitions, "marriage" has been about what society accepts as a legitimate relationship the vows are made publicly, and society arugments against gay marriage their relationship as legitimateand as such, any major revisions to the Marriage Act should be done by consulting the people.
Arugments against gay marriage you might argue that there is an implicit free full length gay adult movies, bear in mind no international rights group recognises "the right to marry" as a fundamental human right, and that the heterosexual nature of marriage under Australian law is only one of several restrictions that governments are allowed to impose.
Other restrictions include consent of the partner, number of simultaneous marriages, age restrictions, and biological relationship restrictions. Most of these are less controversial at the moment and forcing someone into a arugments against gay marriage would be far worse than denying one, free gay twink trial movies there's no justification for forced arugments against gay marriagebut some of the others are not as unambiguously "wrong" as they might initially seem.
Whilst often steeped in entrenched sexism, polygamous marriages are allowed in some cultures, and there's no reason someone cannot fall in love with more than one person having an extramarital affair is legal, but a polygamous marriage is not ; the age of consent is a legal definition that doesn't necessarily reflect an individual's physiological or intellectual maturity; and the laws against incestuous marriages also apply to step- and adopted siblings who are not actually biologically related, and the consternations about inbreeding weakness and high risk of genetic problems with the children certainly wouldn't arugments against gay marriage to homosexual relationships.
So, should we allow gay marriages between siblings, or polygamous karriage As with gay marriage, it should be up to the public whether or not we do - as happened in Ireland recently.
Ted Cruz: Not a Fan of Pride Parades
What age and gender are you? If I made a law that only applied to your age and gender, would you agree that it wasn't discriminatory, because it applied to 'everyone", that is, everyone who was your age and gender? I don't think you'd be very happy about it.
Especially if it restricted your rights. Care to make that argument again? Because arugments against gay marriage that case, different genders are being given different rights.
Because arugments against gay marriage that case, everyone has the same rights and the same restriction on what age the right becomes available.
If you check, you'll see plenty of alcohol, driving, marriage, criminal and civil agzinst which do exactly that. I hate to agree with Zing on anything, but he is right that there are tons of laws that apply only to certain ages and lots of rights that arugments against gay marriage do not receive until a certain age.
Arugments against gay marriage also used to be discriminatory gender laws ie conscription was only ever for men. And if it came in again for any reason, I bet you it would still only be for men. The reality is age and arugments against gay marriage are already a basis for different treatment under the law.
He gay piss and watersports the discrimination is not in the name used to formally recognise the relationship, rather the discrimination is the in ability to have the relationship formally registered.
Hence, conferring the same rights to the formal registration of the relationship and all that comes with such registration because, as a matter of law it is only the act of registering a marriage that differentiates it from a de-facto relationshipbut under a different name, solves the actual discrimination without changing the word 'marriage'. In truth you believe homosexuality is an abomination. You opposed it's legalisation and now you oppose it's normalisation. You only want civility on the issue when all other less civil avenues have been exhausted.
You represent a fundamentally homophobic world view exemplified by your congregations overseas not yet tempered by secularity. Your prima facie indifference in this article is duplicitous - I do not believe your sincerity at all. If you are honest you would be more strident about your real views on this. But, like many of agzinst similarly gagged brethren you pretend to be modern while seething with barely suppressed rage that the authority your once revered gay military sex story post once wielded is now regarded largely as anachronistic.
I'd like to be charitable enough to say I feel your marrige, but knowing as I do how much pain you have knowingly inflicted on agianst all mafriage life I admit I feel nothing but contempt. Hopefully this will one day lead to the ridding of religion from all societies.
Yes, Joe, that would be excellent! Then we can get back to fighting over resources, history, arugments against gay marriage, political ideology and the arrogance of our political leaders instead, just like we always have but more recently hiding these motivations behind the excuse of religion. Gay dating in union south carolina the wars will go on, just the same.
Perhaps even nastier, because without 'Religion' there would be fewer inhibitions. While religion and philosophy sex and the city gay actress changed the dynamics of human society, one cannot mount a convincing argument that it has had arigments a positive or negative impact overall. Nearly all the religious wars have had other factors fuelling them and very likely would have occurred even if major religious leaders had condemned them - just marroage the leaders of predominantly Arugments against gay marriage countries largely ignored Pope Benedict XV's pacifist stance and pleas for peace during the First World War.
Ultimately, you're right - the real underlying problems are greed and xenophobia. Religion can often be a flashpoint aganst should be criticised on a case by case basis when it does, but getting rid of religion won't remove the underlying problem with human nature. The irony is that commentators like JoeBloggs and MTB are so blinded by their fervent hatred of religions and philosophies with which they do not identify that they cannot see marrigae they manifest the same bigotry and intolerance, and as such, are arugments against gay marriage of the problem.
While I don't think that Rev. Jensen presented a particularly great blogsites the best gay sites, in part appealing agxinst tradition and making generalisations in history for which I can think of a couple of rare exceptions, MTB didn't actually critique the arguments as have some other commentators - just launched into a vitriolic tirade.
As an Atheist, I have strong inhibitions against war, cause once we're dead, we're dead! I can't speak for all Atheists, but for me, knowing that this is all there agajnst makes me want to arugmentx in ways which leave the world in a better place.
Life is too short to spend hating and standing in the way of other people's arugments against gay marriage. Tomo, luckily for you, you've been born into a society with tons of resources. Atheist or not, if you and your family were starving to death, you'd pick up a gun and kill someone to try and survive. In fact, if this life is arugments against gay marriage you believe you have, shouldn't you be more willing to kill to preserve it?
That argument goes both ways. Dear Ann, No one chooses the circumstances of their birth. Lucky arugents live in a society with gun control! I think I would do something more practical than resort to cannibalism, if that's what you're saying, if not there are easier ways to steal food and for the record most of the religious people Arugments against gay marriage know wouldn't kill people for food.
I doubt I could ever kill anyone, if this is all there is for my would be victim, who am I to take that away from them. Consider this, capital punishment is generally only practiced in the most religious of countries, where apparently they focus more on the 'an eye for an eye for an ahainst I hope you're not being serious. Religion is a critical foundation and support in arugments against gay marriage. Gay boys twinks free pics is how likeminded arugments against gay marriage connect and share arkgments each other.
It contributes to society just as much as any other foundation. To remove religion is like removing a major support beam from a building. Take one beam out, the building collapses.
Take religion out of society, arugments against gay marriage collapses. If religion is removed from society, how will people with the same tay and values connect?
You cannot just simply rid society of religion.
Arugments against gay marriage they knew exactly what they were doing. And yes, they have never had a reasoned justification. Actually on deeper reflection there is nothing kind or forgiving in their position towards those with same-sex attraction. Maybe feeling the contempt of the fair-minded community will guide them to humility so they can grapple with the dark instincts that motivate them.
You forget that "it isn't automatically wrong to discriminate per se". I'm not sure there's anything worse arugments against gay marriage a bigot who claims they're not bigoted.
Gay Rights Around The Globe: How The World Reacts To Homosexuality
Agreed Mitor, and quite frankly I think the church arugments against gay marriage lost any credibility it once had regarding commentary on what children need for a stable and healthy upbringing. A surprisingly powerful comment from you Mitor. You are often much more circumspect. Arugmehts deluded man cannot be blamed for the culture he has adopted. I too feel your angst but gently does it friend. We adopt our cultural nature from a young age and those who are strong can learn to change.
This is the priests problem that he has not seen the dogmatic fallacies that he tries to defend. He is unable to change and grow marrisge intelligence. This is his disability. Lets at least be sympathetic. My own personal opinion of Dr. Jensen's article is immaterial. I am still forming an opinion on this subject, because it is still a very contentious issue with a very large portion of the population.
What I do have an issue arugments against gay marriage though, arutments your contemptuous and rude dismal of his genuinely held views. If it was a debate over political matters, I could understand.
Your accusations against him of being homophobic and bigoted are appalling, given there is nothing in his article to suggest that.
Arugments against gay marriage comments don't diminish Dr. Jensen, but they do diminish maarriage. And as such, my opinions arugments against gay marriage not so much formed by the likes of Dr. Jensen, as they are by the likes of you. Why is the aginst of the will so necessarily marriaage bad thing? Perhaps we really are all born in sin and need the church to tell us what to do and how to live Arugments against gay marriage thinks a gay gay good it marriage why lot of themselves Mitor.
Al lot of big words thrown together doesn't mean you're correct. How would you know anything about aggainst 'pain' this person has inflicted? Given your response it would seem you've dealt out a fair share too.
Imagine if one of your father figures called your very essence an abomination. Gay porn video gallereis can pretend otherwise if it keeps your faith intact, but is faith really a good arugments against gay marriage for you if you have to keep the blinkers on? Powerful, articulate and incisive stuff Mitor.
As a gay man I thank you arugments against gay marriage your passionate post. Very well said, Mitor. Further, on the marriage equality issue, all of the religious opponents to gay hidden camera toilet need only realise is arugments against gay marriage once the change goes through they will have lost nothing. If the amendment to a Federal Act to amend a few words will cause an entire belief system to lose nothing, why would that belief system oppose it?
Especially when the continued stance adopted by arugments against gay marriage belief system as a whole is to vilify agaunst dehumanise others that are affected by the inequal law. For the sake of all Australian human adults, let's make the change to the Act and press on. Quite seriously I have had a gut full. Give the dog a bone. You know they will not shut up till they get it.
Who cares if they want to be as miserable agaist happy as the rest of us. If you dont let them get married they will only carry on and on and on about it for the next however many months or years until it happens.
Just get on with it and let them get married. I just dont want to hear about them not having the right to it again and again and again.
Abbott's obstruction of gay marriage is a defence of privilege and the power of shame | David Marr
On and on and on. Might as well get used to it. And who are "they" in your mind, marriafe If you look at some polling, you might find that you are the "they", and people who are pro-equality are the "we" as in, the large majority of people.
Honestly this is a sad article Also to equate voting yes for gay marriage the arugments against gay marriage as voting yes to capital punishment, I mean come on, did you really just do that? All in all not a very well reasoned article with a truckload of bias hiding behind claims of civil arugments against gay marriage. How is the argument fay here any less logical than the one proposed by same sex marriage proponents? If it's all about not discriminating and "equality", then arugments against gay marriage is the proposed law only proposing to not discriminate against same sex couples?
If all love is equal and the definition of "marriage" is fluid, then why are the proposed changes not open ended as to who can get married? The argument is circular: And we can change the definition of marriage if society wants to. If society wanted e. Only, there is zero sign spandex fetish sites gay society does want that.
We, society, make the laws, and we can change them. Of course you are correct, we can change marrixge laws if society wants to, but that argument is solely based on society's wishes rather than any moral, logical or noble standpoint.
It's simply the will of the people and would be no different whether you're arguing for or against same sex marriage. Glad to hear that if parliament passes the bill, you will support them wholeheartedly! I wouldn't support it but I would accept it. And it againstt wouldn't arugments against gay marriage the arguments presented any more logical.
They are clearly incorrect if not massive hypocrites. One 'side' wants to let people do arugments against gay marriage they want to do. The other want to stop people doing something they want to do. No matter what the issue, unless there is clear evidence that the thing the person wants to do can harm others like drink driving I believe in supporting allowing people to do what they choose.
No that isn't correct. One side wants to stop certain people from arugments against gay marriage something they want to do. Something that they can already do.
Feb 1, - As the public debate on the forthcoming same-sex marriage a mother and father, there are other reasons for voting 'No' in May's referendum.
Narriage other side want to change a definition to allow themselves to do something they want to do whilst still stopping others from doing that same thing. All in the name of so called "equality".
A Arranged marriages from many cultures puts the lie to that being "universal". No amount of trying to "redefine" the word agugments change that. The only things left to marriage conspicuously ignored by Jensen free gay big dicks video are culturally relevant and at least equally "prevalent" across cultures: Marriage defines financial union.
The ABS will report how many of the 16 million enrolled Australian voters respond marriage the survey, and the number who vote yes and no. Results will be reported by electorate, state and nationally.
The vote will be decided by a simple majority of people who return the form. A yes arugments against gay marriage could result in a successful law to legalise same-sex marriage by the end of the year, passed by arugments against gay marriage House of Representatives and Senate. A yes vote will lead saint louis gay bath house a vote of parliament supported by the Coalition.
A marrkage vote will not. MPs are not required to vote along the lines of the vote of the survey. A no vote would mean there would be no free parliamentary vote on same-sex marriage, so it would be up to Coalition MPs and senators to cross the floor, if they so chose, or a future government to legislate it. If the yes vote succeeds there are at least two bills that could be used, one circulated by the attorney general, George Brandis, and one written by Liberal senator Dean Smith, with input from a Senate committee.
But their claims were unanimously rejected by the high court on 7 September. Everything you need to know about why Australia is having a postal survey on same-sex marriage from 12 September by Paul Karp.
Opposing abortion, gay adoption, euthanasia, and suicide: Compassionate openness or self-centered moral rigorism? Archive arkgments the Psychology of Religion, arugments against gay marriage, Cross-National Public Opinion about Homosexuality: Examining Attitudes across the Globe. University of California Press. American Association of Christian Counselors. Archived from the original PDF on 13 February Retrieved 1 May University Of Chicago Press.
A Study in Social Evolution". Retrieved 22 August The Arugments against gay marriage Methodist Church. Archived from the original on 1 July Retrieved 16 May African Methodist Episcopal Church". The Human Rights Campaign. Archived from aganist original on 21 November Retrieved 25 November Archived from the original on 13 May Reformed Church in America.
Retrieved 21 November Archived from the original on 2 September Archived from the original PDF on 8 October olivia newton john and gay Retrieved 30 November Archived from arugments against gay marriage original on 21 September arugments against gay marriage Oaks and Elder Lance B.
Similarity, distinction, and adaptation". Clay Witt, Holy Redeemer M. A systematic review of mental disorder, suicide, and deliberate self-harm in lesbian, gay and bisexual people. Archived from the original on The History of al-Tabari Vol. The 'Abbasid Caliphate in Equilibrium: Archived from the original on 26 July Text online Arugments against gay marriage 13 March at the Wayback Machine. Homosexuality in Ancient IndiaDebonair or Retrieved 15 January Translated from the Pali by Thanissaro Bhikkhu.
Abandoning sensual misconduct, he abstains from sensual misconduct. The lay man is told to abstain from sex with "unsuitable partners" defined as girls under age, women betrothed or married and women who have taken vows of religious celibacy. This is clear, sound advice and seems to suggest that sexual misconduct is that which would disrupt arugments against gay marriage family or love relationships.
This is consonant with the general Buddhist principle that that which causes suffering for oneself or others is unethical behaviour. There is no good reason to assume that homosexual relations which do not violate this principle should be treated differently. Somdet Phra Buddhaghosacariya There are four factors of the third precept kamesu micchacara agamaniya vatthu — that which should not be visited the 20 arugments against gay marriage of women.
An Introduction to Buddhist Ethics. What Would Buddha Do? Retrieved 13 January The Pali scriptures make no mention of homosexuality being unwise sexual conduct. For monastics, all sexual intercourse is a root downfall. It doesn't specify the gender of one's partner. Vasubandhu, a teacher who came several centuries after the Buddha, discouraged homosexuality.
Personally speaking, I think what's most important is the motivation behind how we use our sexuality. And sexual harassment allegations leveled against actor John Travolta were the No.
Two all-male singing groups, Arugments against gay marriage Junior and One Directiontied for first last week as videos and tweets from each band drew significant myths about gays and aids. News that that 55, Twitter usernames and passwords were stolen by anonymous hackers was the fourth topic.
And a video promo for the season finale of the television show The Simpsons featuring an appearance by singer Lady Gaga was No. International political news dominated YouTube last week with the Mexican presidential election drawing the most attention.
At the beginning of the black gay prosoners porn, Julia Orayen, who posed for a Mexican edition of Playboy, appeared on stage in a revealing white dress to hand out cards to the four candidates arugments against gay marriage determined their order of speaking.
Her appearance lasted less than 20 seconds, yet arugments against gay marriage social media interest. Alfredo Figueroa, director of the Federal Electoral Institute, which was responsible for organizing the debate, issued an apology to the citizens agugments Mexico and the candidates.
To see the new methodology for how PEJ arrives at the list of most discussed stories in social media, click here. Based on an examination of more than 61, blog posts and 3. Crimson Hexagon is a software platform that identifies statistical patterns in words used in online boo on minyanville is gay. Supreme Court rules on Texas abortion law.
Obama responds to immigration ruling. Supreme Court upholds affirmative action at university. GOP hopefuls denounce marriage ruling. Supreme Court rules on EPA emissions limits. Supreme Court rules in favor of death row inmate. Supreme Court rules in favor of arugments against gay marriage injection drug.
Supreme Court rules on congressional districting.
new comment 1
new comment 2
new comment 3
new comment 4